Trois problÈmes semblables de moyenne
pas si semblables que ça ! l’influence de la
structure d’un problÈme
sur les rÉponses des
ÉlÈves
THREE SIMILAR MEAN PROBLEMS: ARE
THEY REALLY
THAT SIMILAR? RESEARCH ON
THE INFLUENCE OF THE
STRUCTURE OF THE PROBLEM
ON STUDENTS’
RéSPONSES
Claudine Mary
Université
de Sherbrooke
Linda Gattuso
Université
du Québec à Montréal
RÉsumÉ
Les résultats
sont tirés d’une étude plus large sur les stratégies de résolution que des
élèves de 2e, 3e et 4e secondaires (14 à 16
ans) utilisent pour résoudre des problèmes de moyenne. Dans ce texte, les
résolutions de trois problèmes seront analysées. Ces problèmes ont été composés
de telle sorte que nous puissions distinguer entre la capacité des élèves de
calculer une moyenne et celle de saisir les liens qu’il y a entre la
modification de l’effectif et d’une donnée et celle de la moyenne. Les
problèmes visaient aussi à tester l’influence d’une donnée égale à zéro,
influence signalée dans les études précédentes. Les résultats de la présente
étude font voir que, dans le contexte choisi, le type et le sens des modifications
effectuées influencent les comportements des élèves et que des conceptions
inadéquates ou des glissements de sens apparaissent dans certaines situations
et pas dans d’autres. Note: Un long resume en anglais precede l’article qui est
ecrit en francais.
Mots-clés: Recherche en
enseignement de la statistique; Moyenne arithmétique; Enseignement secondaire
Abstract
The results are taken from a much larger study on the strategies that pupils in the 2nd, 3rd and 4th stages at secondary school (ages 14-16) use for solving problems concerning the mean. In this paper the solutions of three problems are analysed. These problems have been formulated to be of such a kind that we can distinguish between the ability of pupils to calculate a mean, and that of realising the effect of a change in the number of observations or in the value of an observation, on the mean. The problems were also seen to test the influence of a value equal to zero on the mean, drawn attention to in earlier research studies. The results of the current study show us, in the chosen context, the type and sense of the modifications exerting influence on the manipulations of the pupils, and that inadequate conceptions or a change of meaning appeared in certain situations and not in others. Note: An extended summary in English is provided at the beginning of this paper, which is written in French.
Keywords: Statistics education research; Arithmetic mean; High school
__________________________
Statistics Education Research
Journal, 4(2), 82-102, http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj
Ó International Association for Statistical Education (IASE/ISI), Nov, 2005
RÉFÉRENCES
Bell, A., Fischbein, R., & Greer, B. (1984). Choice of operation in verbal arithmetic problems: The effects of number size, problem structure and context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 129-147.
Cai, J. (1995). Beyond the computational algorithm: Students’
understanding of the arithmetic average concept. In L. Meira & D. Carraher
(Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th
International Conference for the
Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 3, pp. 144-151). Pernambuco, Brazil: Universidade Federal de
Permanbuco.
Cerquetti-Aberkane,
F. (1987). Des erreurs et des maîtres. Les erreurs des élèves trouvent souvent
leur source chez les enseignants. Prospectives, octobre, 120.
Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: Implications for research. Journal for Research in Mathematics, 19, 44-63.
Gattuso, L., & Mary, C. (1996). Development of concepts of the arithmetic average from high school to university. In L. Puig & A. Gutiérrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 401-408). Valenzia, Spain.
Gattuso, L., & Mary, C. (1998). Development of the concept of weighted average among high-school children. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. S. Kea, T. W. Kee & W-K. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (pp. 685-692). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
Gattuso, L., & Mary, C.
(2001). Pupils perception of the links between data and their arithmetic
average. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th International Conference for the
Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 2, pp. 25-32). The Netherlands: Utrecht University.
Hardiman, P., Well, A., & Pollatsek, A. (1984). Usefulness of a balance model in understanding the mean. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(5), 792-801.
Kaplan, R. (1999). The nothing that is a natural history of zero. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lappan, G., & Zawojewski, J. (1988). Teaching statistics: Mean, median, and mode. Arithmetic Teacher, March 88, 25-26.
Lavoie, P., & Gattuso, L. (1998). An historical exploration of the concept of average. In L. Pereira-Mendoza, L. S. Kea, T. W. Kee & W-K. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (pp. 1051-1058). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
Leon, M., & Zawojewski, J. (1990). Use of arithmetic mean: An investigation of four
properties issues and preliminary results. In D. Vere-Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of Third
International Conference on Teaching Statistics Vol. 1: School and General
Issues (pp. 302-306). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical
Institute.
Mary, C.,
& Gattuso, L. (2003).
L’influence des grandeurs impliquées sur la résolution d’un problème de
moyenne. Communication dans le cadre du
colloque EMF 2003, Tozeur, Tunisie, décembre, 2003.
Mevarech, Z.R. (1983). A deep structure model of students’ statistical misconceptions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14, 415-429.
Mokros, J., & Russell, S. (1995). Children’s concepts of average and representativeness. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(1), 20-39.
Pollatsek, A., Lima, S., & Well, A.D. (1981). Concept or Computation: Students’ Understanding of the Mean. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 191-204.
Semadeni, Z. (1984). A principle of concretization permanence for the formation of arithmetical concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15, 379-395.
Stern, E., & Lehmdorfer, A. (1992). The role of situational context in solving word problems. Cognitive Development, 7, 259-268.
Strauss,
S., & Bichler, E. (1988). The development of children’s concepts of
the arithmetic average. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 64-80.
Vergnaud, G.
(1996). La théorie des camps
conceptuels. In J. Brun
(Ed.), Didactique des mathématiques
(pp. 197-242). Lausanne: Delachaux et Niestlé.
Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (1999). The development of concepts of average. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21(4), 15-39.
Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B.
(2000). The longitudinal development of understanding of average. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(1
& 2), 11-50.
Claudine Mary
Département d’études sur l’adaptation scolaire et sociale
Université de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, J1K 2R1
Canada