Methods of Learning in Statistical Education:

a Randomized Trial of public health graduate students

 

FELICITY BOYD ENDERS, PhD

Mayo Clinic, Division of Biostatistics

enders.felicity@mayo.edu

 

MARIE DIENER-WEST, PhD

Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biostatistics

mdiener@jhsph.edu

 

ABSTRACT

 

A randomized trial of 265 consenting students was conducted within an introductory biostatistics course: 69 received eight small group cooperative learning sessions; 97 accessed internet learning sessions; 96 received no intervention. Effect on examination score (95% CI) was assessed by intent-to-treat analysis and by incorporating reported participation. No difference was found by intent-to-treat analysis. After incorporating reported participation, adjusted average improvement was 1.7 points (-1.8, 5.2) per cooperative session and 2.1 points (-1.4, 5.5) per internet session after one examination. After four examinations, adjusted average improvement for four study sessions was 5.3 points (0.4, 10.3) per examination for cooperative learning and 8.1 points (3.0, 13.2) for internet learning. Consistent participation in active learning may improve understanding beyond the traditional classroom.

Keywords: Statistics education research; Active learning; Cooperative learning; Internet learning; Randomized trial

 

 

__________________________

Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(1), 5-19, http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj

Ó International Association for Statistical Education (IASE/ISI), May, 2006

 

 

 

References

 

Bradstreet, T. E. (1996). Teaching introductory statistics courses so that nonstatisticians experience statistical reasoning. The American Statistician, 50(1), 69-78.

Franke, R. H., & Kaul, J. D. (1978). The Hawthorne experiments: First statistical interpretation. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 623-643.

Garfield, J. (1993). Teaching statistics using small-group cooperative learning. Journal of Statistics Education, 1(1).

[Online: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse]

Garfield, J. B. (1995a). Respondent: How should we be teaching statistics? The American Statistician, 49(1), 18-20.

Garfield, J. (1995b). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review, 63(1), 25-34.

Gnanandesikan, M., Scheaffer, R. L., Watkins, A.E., & Witmer, J.A. (1997). An activity-based statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 5(2).

[Online: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse]

Green, S. B. (2002). Design of randomized trials. Epidemiologic Reviews, 24(1), 4-11.

Hoffrage, U., Lindsey, S., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Communicating statistical information. Science, 290(5500), 2261-2262.

The Kemeny/Kurtz Math Series. (1992). Algebra workbook. USA: True Basic, Inc.

Kvam, P. H. (2000). The effect of active learning methods on student retention in engineering statistics. The American Statistician, 54(2), 136-140.

Lovett, M. C., & Greenhouse, J. B. (2000). Applying cognitive theory to statistics instruction. The American Statistician, 54(3), 196-206.

Magel, R. C. (1998). Using cooperative learning in a large introductory statistics class. Journal of Statistics Education, 6(3).

[Online: http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse]

McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models. London: Chapman & Hall.

Moore, D. S. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review, 65(2), 123-165.

Scheaffer, R. L., Gnanadesikan, M., Watkins, A., & Witmer, J. A. (1996). Activity-based statistics: Instructor resources. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

Shaughnessy, J. M. (1977). Misconceptions of probability: An experiment with a small-group, activity-based, model building approach to introductory probability at the college level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8, 295-316.

Simpson, J. M. (1995). Teaching statistics to non-specialists. Statistics in Medicine, 14, 199-208.

SiteCatalyst (formerly SuperStat). (2002). Nashville, TN: Omniture, Inc.

[Online: http://www.omniture.com/]

Smith, G. (1998). Learning statistics by doing statistics. Journal of Statistics Education, 6(3).

[Online: www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v6n3/smith.html]

The Stata Corporation. (2001). Intercooled Stata version 7, Houston Station, TX.

Utts, J., Sommer, B., Acredolo, C., Maher, M. W., & Matthews, H. R. (2003). A study comparing traditional and hybrid internet-based instruction in introductory statistics classes. Journal of Statistics Education, 11(3).

[Online: www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v11n3/utts.html]

Ward, B. (2004). The best of both worlds: A hybrid statistics course. Journal of Statistics Education, 12(3).

[Online: www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v12n3/ward.html]

Wulff, H. R., Anderson, B., Brandenhoff, P., & Guttlet, F. (1987). What do doctors know about statistics? Statistics in Medicine, 6, 3-10.

 

FELICITY BOYD ENDERS, PHD, MPH

Division of Biostatistics

Division of Health Sciences Research

The Mayo Clinic

200 First Street, SW

Rochester, MN 55905, USA