Approaching the borderlands of
statistics and mathematics in the classroom: qualitative analysis engenderING
an unexpected journey
Jane M. Watson
University of Tasmania
Jane.Watson@utas.edu.au
Erica L. nathan
University of Tasmania
Erica.Nathan@utas.edu.au
abstract
To capture aspects of pedagogical
content knowledge (PCK) not illuminated in an earlier written survey, an
interview protocol was used with 40 middle school teachers. The scenarios were
intended to elicit teachers' understanding of the big ideas, ability to
anticipate students' answers, and intervention strategies for the classroom.
This was expected to be a straight-forward journey based on teachers' responses
to three context-based scenarios regarding students' answers to questions.
Instead we were surprised by teachers' responses that revealed their
perceptions that their experiences teaching mathematics and teaching statistics
are very different. This led to further analysis of the PCK tasks and a
suggestion that the mathematics embedded in the tasks was sometimes an
impediment for the teachers, especially in relation to intervention strategies
in the classroom.
Keywords: Statistics education
research; Teaching statistics; Teaching mathematics; Pedagogical content
knowledge; Teacher interviews
__________________________
Statistics Education Research Journal,
9(2), 69-87, http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj
Ó International Association for Statistical
Education (IASE/ISI), November, 2010
References
Assessment Qualification Alliance. (2009). GSE A-level
statistics. UK: Author.
[Online: web.aqa.org.uk/qual/gce/maths/stats_noticeboard.php?id=01&prev=01]
Bouma,
G., & Ling, R. (2004). The
research process (5th ed.). South
Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.
Callingham,
R., & Watson J. M. (2008). Overcoming research design issues
using Rasch measurement: The StatSmart
project. In P. Jeffery (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2007 Australian Association for Research in
Education annual conference. Victoria: Australian Association for
Research in Education.
[Online: http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/cal07042.pdf]
Chick,
H. L. (2007). Teaching
and learning by example. In J. Watson & K. Beswick
(Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research,
essential practice. Proceedings
of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research
Group of Australasia (Vol. 1, pp. 3-21).
Adelaide, SA: MERGA
Cobb, G. W., & Moore, D. S.
(1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. American Mathematical Monthly, 104(9),
801-824.
College Board. (2008). AP Statistics course
description. New York:
Author.
[Online:
apcentral.collegeboard.com/apc/public/repository/ap08_statistics_coursedesc.pdf]
Hill, H.
C., Rowan, R., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student
achievement. American Educational
Research Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
Konold, C., & Miller, C. D. (2005). TinkerPlots: Dynamic Data Exploration
[Computer software]. Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
Lampert,
M. (2001). Teaching
problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale
University Press.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ministry of Education. (2007). Draft mathematics and
statistics curriculum. Wellington, NZ: Author.
National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston,
VA: Author.
Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence
and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work
published 1960)
Shulman, L.
S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
Watson, J. M., & Callingham, R. A. (2003).
Statistical literacy: A complex hierarchical construct. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(2), 3-46.
[Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/serj/SERJ2(2)_Watson_Callingham.pdf]
Watson, J., Callingham, R.,
& Donne, J. (2008a). Establishing PCK for teaching
statistics. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading,
& A. Rossman (Eds.), Joint ICME/IASE study: Teaching statistics in school mathematics. Challenges for teaching and teacher education. Proceedings of the ICMI Study 18 and the 2008 IASE Round Table
Conference. Voorburg, The
Netherlands: International Association for Statistical Education.
[Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/rt08/T2P10_Watson.pdf]
Watson, J., Callingham, R.,
& Donne, J. (2008b). Proportional reasoning: Student knowledge and
teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. In M. Goos,
R. Brown, & K. Makar (Eds.), Navigating currents and charting directions. Proceedings of the 31st annual
conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 2, pp. 555-562). Adelaide,
SA: MERGA.
Watson, J., Callingham,
R., & Nathan, E. (2009). Probing teachers' pedagogical content
knowledge in statistics: “How will Tom get to school tomorrow?” In R. Hunter,
B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing
divides (Vol. 2, pp. 563-570). Palmerston North,
NZ: MERGA.
Watson, J., & Nathan, E. (2010a). Assessing
the interpretation of two-way tables as part of statistical literacy. In
C. Reading (Ed.), ICOTS-8 Proceedings: Towards an evidence
based society. Voorburg, The
Netherlands: International Association for Statistical Education, International
Statistical Institute.
[Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/icots8/ICOTS8_5E1_WATSON.pdf]
Watson, J.,
& Nathan, E. (2010b). Biased sampling and PCK: The case of the marijuana
problem. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C.
Hurst (Eds.), Shaping the future of
mathematics education. Proceedings of the 33rd annual
conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (Vol. 2, pp. 610-617). Fremantle,
WA: MERGA.
Jane M. Watson
Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania
Private Bag 66
Hobart, Tasmania 7001
Australia