REASONING ABOUT SHAPE AS A PATTERN IN VARIABILITY
This paper examines ways in which coherent reasoning about key concepts such as variability, sampling, data, and distribution can be developed as part of statistics education. Instructional activities that could support such reasoning were developed through design research conducted with students in grades 7 and 8. Results are reported from a teaching experiment with grade 8 students that employed two instructional activities in order to learn more about their conceptual development. A “growing a sample” activity had students think about what happens to the graph when bigger samples are taken, followed by an activity requiring reasoning about shape of data. The results suggest that the instructional activities enable conceptual growth. Last, implications for teaching, assessment and research are discussed.
Keywords: Design research; Distribution; Instructional activities; Middle school level; Sampling
Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(2), 64-83, http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj
Ó International Association for Statistical Education (IASE/ISI), November, 2004
Bakker, A. (2003). The early history of statistics and implications for education. Journal of Statistics Education, 11(1). [Online: www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v11n1/bakker.html]
Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education: On symbolizing and computer tools. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-Beta Press. [Online: http://www.library.uu.nl/digiarchief/dip/diss/2004-0513-153943/inhoud.htm]
Bakker, A., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2004). Learning to reason about distribution. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 147–167). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bakker, A., & Hoffmann, M.H.G. (in press). Diagrammatic reasoning as the basis for developing concepts: A semiotic analysis of students’ learning about statistical distribution. Educational Studies in Mathematics.
Ben-Zvi, D., & Arcavi, A. (2001). Junior high school students’ construction of global views of data and data representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45, 35–65.
Cobb, G. (1993). Considering statistics education: A National Science Foundation Conference. Journal of Statistics Education, 1(1). [Online: www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v1n1/cobb.html]
Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(1), 5–43.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A. A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.
Cobb, P., Gravemeijer, K. P. E., Bowers, J., & Doorman, M. (1997). Statistical Minitools [applets and applications]. Nashville, TN & Utrecht: Vanderbilt University & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University. [Translated and revised in 2001 by Bakker, A.] [Online: www.wisweb.nl/en]
Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (2003). Learning about statistical covariation. Cognition and Instruction 21, 1–78.
Frege, F. L. G. (1976). Wissenschaftlichter Briefwechsel [Scientific correspondence] (Gabriel, G., Ed.) (First ed. Vol. 2). Hamburg, Germany: Meiner.
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education: China lectures. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2004). Research on statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking: Issues, challenges, and implications. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 397–409). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory; Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1994). Educational development and developmental research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 25, 443–471.
Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1999, April). An instructional sequence of analysing univariate data sets. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Education Research Association, Montréal, Canada.
Hancock, C., Kaput, J. J., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Authentic enquiry with data: critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist 27(3), 337–364.
Konold, C., & Higgins, T. (2003). Reasoning about data. In J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin & D. Schifter (Eds.), A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics (pp. 193–215). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Konold, C., & Pollatsek, A. (2002). Data analysis as the search for signals in noisy processes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 259–289.
Konold, C., Robinson, A., Khalil, K., Pollatsek, A., Well, A. D., Wing, R., & Mayr, S. (2002). Students' use of modal clumps to summarize data. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Cape Town, South Africa. [CD-ROM] Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistics Institute.
Makar, K., & Confrey, J. (2004). Secondary teachers’ reasoning about comparing two groups. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenges of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 353–373). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
McGatha, M., Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2002). An analysis of students’ initial statistical understanding: Developing a conjectured learning trajectory. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 339–355.
Mokros, J., & Russell, S. J. (1995). Children’s concepts of average and representativeness. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 20–39.
Peirce, C. S. (1976). The new elements of mathematics (Eisele, C., Ed.) (Vol. I-IV). The Hague-Paris/Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Mouton/Humanities Press.
Petrosino, A. J., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Structuring error and experimental variation as distribution in the fourth grade. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(2&3), 131–156.
Russell, S. J., & Corwin, R. B. (1989). Statistics: The shape of the data. Used numbers: Real data in the classroom. Grades 4-6. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
Schwartz, D. L., Goldman, S. R., Vye, N. J., Barron, B. J., & Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998). Aligning everyday and mathematical reasoning: The case of sampling assumptions. In S. P. Lajoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: Learning, teaching, and assessment in grades K-12 (First ed., pp. 233–273). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Simon, M. A. (1995). Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 114–145.
Steinbring, H. (1980). Zur Entwicklung des Wahrscheinlichkeitsbegriffs - Das Anwendungsproblem in der Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie aus didaktischer sicht. [On the development of the probability concept - The applicability problem in probability theory from a didactical perspective]. Bielefeld: Institut für Didaktik der Mathematik der Universität Bielefeld.
Van den Boer, C. (2003). Als je begrijpt wat ik bedoel. Een zoektocht naar verklaringen voor achterblijvende prestaties van allochtone leerlingen in het wiskundeonderwijs [If you know what I mean. A search for an explanation of lagging results of mathematics education among ethnic minority students]. [CDROM] Utrecht, The Netherlands: Beta Press.
Van Oers, B. (2000). The appropriation of mathematics symbols: A psychosemiotic approach to mathematics learning. In P. Cobb, E. Yackel & K. McClain (Eds.), Symbolizing and communicating in mathematics classrooms; Perspectivies on discourse, tools, and instructional design (pp. 133–176). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wilensky, U. (1997). What is normal anyway? Therapy for epistemological anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 171–202.
Since September 1, 2004:
Institute of Education
University of London
23-29 Emerald Street
London WC1N 3QS