STUDENTS’ EXPECTATIONS OF INTRODUCTORY

STATISTICS INSTRUCTORS

 

Mark a. earley

Bowling Green State University

earleym@bgsu.edu

 

ABSTRACT

 

The purpose of this phenomenological study was to talk to students about their experiences taking introductory statistics. The author met with eleven students individually for four interviews throughout the semester, followed by a member-checking focus group during the last week of classes. One of the most salient themes to emerge was the students’ reliance on their instructor for feedback about performance, directions on taking notes, and the creation of a classroom environment that motivated them to study. As part of the phenomenological tradition, the author presents his own reflections based on these students’ comments. Conclusions include the encouragement of instructors to be more mindful of students’ reactions to course content, and suggestions for developing a more learner-centered learning environment.

 

Keywords: Statistics education research; Teaching statistics; Statistics classroom; Learning environment; Phenomenology

 

 

__________________________

Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(1), 51-66, http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj

Ó International Association for Statistical Education (IASE/ISI), May, 2007

 

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2002). The reluctant respondent. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 515-536). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Batanero, C., Garfield, J. B., Ottaviani, M. G., & Truran, J. (2000, May). Research in statistical education: Some priority questions. Statistical Education Research Newsletter, 1(2), 2-6.

[Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/serj/newsmay00.pdf]

Becker, B. J. (1996). A look at the literature (and other resources) on teaching statistics. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21(1), 71-90.

Boyd, C. O. (2001). Phenomenology the method. In P. L. Munhall (Ed.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (3rd ed., pp. 93-122).  Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.

Carpenter, T. P., & Lehrer, R. (1999). Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. In E. Fennema & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms that promote understanding (pp. 19-32). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Chance, B. L., & Garfield, J. B. (2002). New approaches to gathering data on student learning for research in statistics education. Statistics Education Research Journal, 1(2), 38-44.

[Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/serj/SERJ1(2).pdf]

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Demetrulias, D. M. (1988). (Creatively) teaching the meanings of statistics. The Clearing House, 62, 168-170.

Earley, M. A. (2001). The development of knowledge structures in introductory statistics. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH.

Finney, S. J. (2000, April). The meaning of success for students in statistical methods courses: A phenomenological study. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED441026)

Gal, I., & Garfield, J. B. (Eds.). (1997). The assessment challenge in statistics education. Amsterdam: IOS Press and the International Statistical Institute..

Garfield, J. (1995). How students learn statistics. International Statistical Review, 63(1), 25-34.

Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.

Gordon, S. (1995). A theoretical approach to understanding learners of statistics. Journal of Statistics Education,3(3).

[Online: www.amstat.org/publications /jse/v3n3/gordon.html]

Gordon, S. (2000, May). Bibliography on activity theory and related research in education. Statistical Education Research Newsletter, 1(2), 16-22.

[Online: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/serj/newsmay00.pdf]

Gordon, S. (2004). Understanding students’ experiences of statistics in a service course. Statistics Education Research Journal, 3(1), 40 - 59.

[Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~/iase/serj/SERJ3(1)_gordon.pdf]

Groenewald, T. (2004). A phenomenological research design illustrated. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(1). Article 4.

[Online: www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/3_1/pdf/groenewald.pdf]

Kerry, D. S., & Armour, K. M. (2000). Sport sciences and the promise of phenomenology: Philosophy, method, and insight. QUEST, 52, 1-17.

Ladkin, D. (2005). ‘The enigma of subjectivity’: How might phenomenology help action researchers negotiate the relationship between ‘self’, ‘other’ and ‘truth’? Action Research, 3(1), 108-126.

Laverty, S. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3). Article 3.

[Online: www.ualberta.ca/~iiqm/backissues/2_3final/pdf/laverty.pdf]

Maxwell, J. A. (2005). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mayhew, M. J. (2004). Exploring the essence of spirituality: A phenomenological study of eight students with eight different worldviews. NASPA Journal, 41(3), 647-674.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Murtonen, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2003). Difficulties experienced by education and sociology students in quantitative methodology courses. Studies in Higher Education, 28(2), 171-185.

Oathout, M. J. (1995, April). College students’ theory of learning introductory statistics: Phase one. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (Eric Document Reproduction Service No. ED391841)

Onwuegbuzie, A. J., DaRos, D., & Ryan, J. (1997). The components of statistics anxiety: A phenomenological study. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19, 11-35.

Petocz, P., & Reid, A. (2002). How students experience learning statistics and teaching. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Cape Town, South Africa [CD-ROM]. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.

[Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/publications/1/6b4_peto.pdf]

Petocz, P., & Reid, A. (2003). Relationships between students’ experience of learning statistics and teaching statistics. Statistics Education Research Journal, 2(1), 39-55. [Online: www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~iase/serj/SERJ2(1).pdf]

Pietersen, C. (2002). Research as a learning experience: A phenomenological explication. The Qualitative Report, 7(2), 1-13.

[Online: www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR7-2/pietersen.html]

Reid, A., & Petocz, P. (2002). Students’ conceptions of statistics: A phenomenographic study. Journal of Statistics Education, 10(2).

[Online: www.amstat.org/publications /jse/v10n2/reid.html]

Schau, C., & Mattern, N. (1997). Assessing students’ connected understanding of statistical relationships. In I. Gal & J. B. Garfield (Eds.), The assessment challenge in statistics education (pp. 91-104). Amsterdam: IOS Press and the International Statistical Institute.

Treagust, D. F., Jacobowitz, R., Gallagher, J. L., & Parker, J. (2001). Using assessment as a guide in teaching for understanding: A case study of a middle school science class learning about sound. Science Education, 85(2), 137-157.

van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. New York: SUNY Press.

van Manen, M. (2002). Phenomenology Online.

      [Online: www.phenomenologyonline.com]

Weiss, R. S. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York: The Free Press.

 

MARK A. EARLEY

Division of Educational Foundations & Inquiry

Bowling Green State University

554 Education Building

Bowling Green, Ohio, USA

43403-0246