EVALUATION OF DISTANCE LEARNING IN AN

“INTRODUCTION TO BIOSTATISTICS” CLASS:

A CASE STUDY

 

SCOTT R. eVANS

Harvard University Extension School

evans@sdac.harvard.edu

 

RUI WANG

Harvard University Extension School

rwang@hsph.harvard.edu

 

Tzu-Min Yeh

Harvard University Extension School

tyeh@hsph.harvard.edu

 

JEFF ANDERSON

Harvard University Extension School

janderson@sdac.harvard.edu

 

RAMMY HAIJA

Harvard University Extension School

rammyhaija@hotmail.com

 

PAUL MADOC MCBRATNEY-OWEN

Harvard University Extension School

mcbratn2@fas.harvard.edu

 

LYNNE PEEPLES

Harvard University Extension School

lpeeples@hsph.harvard.edu

 

SUBIR SINHA

Harvard University Extension School

ssinha@sdac.harvard.edu

 

VANESSA XANTHAKIS

Harvard University Extension School

vxanthakis@mclean.harvard.edu

 

NATASA RAJICIC

Harvard University Extension School

nrajicic@hsph.harvard.edu

 

JIAMENG ZHANG

Harvard University Extension School

jiamengz@hsph.harvard.edu

 

 

ABSTRACT

         

Biostatistics is not universally available in colleges/universities and is thus an attractive course to offer via distance education. However, evaluation of the impact of distance education on course enrollment and student success is lacking. We evaluated an “Introduction to Biostatistics” course at Harvard University that offered the distance option (Spring 2005).We assessed the effect on course enrollment and compared the grades of traditional students with non-traditional students, as well as with historical traditional students (Fall 2004). We further compared course evaluations from the inaugural semester with the distance option to evaluations from the prior semester. No evidence of dissimilarities was noted with respect to overall course grade averages or course evaluations. 

 

Keywords: Statistics education research; Biostatistics; Distance education

 

__________________________

Statistics Education Research Journal, 6(2), 59-77, http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj

Ó International Association for Statistical Education (IASE/ISI), November, 2007

 

 

 

REFERENCES

 

Allen, I. E.., & Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States, 2005. Wellesley, MA: The Sloan Consortium.

Allen, M., Bourhis, J., Burrell, N., & Mabry, E. (2002). Comparing student satisfaction with distance education to traditional classrooms in higher education: A meta-analysis. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 83-97.

Bourne, J. R., McMaster, E., Rieger, J., & Campbell, J. O. (1997). Paradigms for on-line learning: A case study in the design and implementation of an asynchronous learning networks (ALN) course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 1(2).

[Online: www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v1n2/]

Bruce, J. C., Bond, S. T., & Jones, M. E. (2002). Teaching epidemiology and statistics by distance learning. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1009-1020.

Carr, S. (2001). Union publishes guide citing high cost of distance education. Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(35), 39-41.

Clow, K. E. (1999). Interactive distance learning: Impact on student course evaluations. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(2), 97-105.

Foster, B. (2003). On-line teaching of mathematics and statistics. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 22(3), 145-153.

Gagne, M., & Shepherd, M. (2001). A comparison between a distance and a traditional graduate accounting class. T.H.E. Journal, 28(9), 58-65.

Gilmour, H. (2002). Discussion: Teaching epidemiology and statistics by distance learning. Statistics in Medicine, 21, 1021-1022.

Harrington, D. (1999). Teaching statistics: A comparison of traditional classroom and programmed instruction/distance learning approaches. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 343-352.

Hillstock, L. G. (2005). A few common misconceptions about distance learning. In P. Smith & C. Smith (Eds.), Campus Technology: Anticipating the Future. Proceedings of the Association of Small Computer Users in Education Annual Conference (pp. 138-145). Myrtle Beach, SC: ASCUE.

Hiltz, S. R., Coppola, N., Rotter, N., & Turoff, M. (2001). Measuring the importance of collaborative learning for the effectiveness of ALN: A multi-measure, multi-method approach. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 4(2).

[Online: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/v4n2/index.asp]

Hodges, J. L., & Lehmann, E. L. (1963). Estimation of location based on rank test. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 34, 598-611.

Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., Shaik, N., & Palma-Rivas, N. (1999). Comparative analysis of online vs. face-to-face instruction. In P. De Bra & J. Leggett (Eds.), Proceedings of the WebNet 99 World Conference on the WWW and Internet (pp. 581-586). Charlotesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education

Katz, Y. J., & Yablon, Y. B. (2003a). Locus of control, self-esteem, motivation and satisfaction, teaching and learning through an internet-based and traditional ‘Introduction to Statistics’ course. The Quality Dialogue — Integrating Quality Cultures in Flexible, Distance and eLearning: Proceedings of European Distance Education Network (pp. 183-187). Rhodes, Greece: EDEN.

Katz, Y. J., & Yablon, Y. B. (2003b). Online university learning: Cognitive and affective perspectives. Campus Wide Information Systems, 20(2) 48-54.

Kendall, M. (2001). Teaching online to campus-based students: The experience of using WebCT for the community information module at Manchester Metropolitan University. Education for Information, 19(4), 325-346.

Lehmann, E. L. (1975). Nonparametrics: Statistical methods based on ranks. San Francisco: Holden-Day.

Li, H. (2002, March). Distance education: Pros, cons, and the future. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Instructional Division, Long Beach, CA.

McGready, J. (2006, August). Basic biostats: Online learning versus onsite learning. Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Seattle, WA.

Merisotis, J. P., & Phipps, R. A. (1999). What’s the difference? Outcomes of distance vs. traditional classroom-based learning. Change, 31(3), 12-17.

Ng, K. (2000). Costs and effectiveness of online courses in distance education. Open Learning, 15(3), 301-308.

Pagano, M., & Gauvreau, K. (2000). Principles of biostatistics (2nd ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.

Phelps, R. H., Wells, R. A., Ashworth, R. L., & Hahn, H. A. (1991). Effectiveness and costs of distance education using computer-mediated communication. American Journal of Distance Education, 5(3), 7-19.

Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What’s the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, DC: The Institute of Higher Education Policy.

[Online: http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/PDF/Difference.pdf]

Rivera, J., McAlister, M., Khris, R., & Margaret, L. (2002). A comparison of student outcomes and satisfaction between traditional and web based course offerings. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3).

[Online: www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/rivera53.html]

Rooney, P., Hussar, W., Planty, M., Choy, S., Hampden-Thompson, G., Provasnik, S., & Fox, M. A. (2006). The Condition of Education, 2006 (NCES 2006-071), U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.

Speed, F. M., & Hardin, H. (2001). Teaching statistics via distance: Duplicating the classroom experience. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 30(2), 391-402.

Stephenson, R. W. (2001). Statistics at a distance. Journal of Statistics Education, 9(3).

[Online: www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v9n3/stephenson.html]

Stokes, M. E., Davis, C. S., & Koch, G. G. (1995). Categorical data analysis using the SAS system. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.

Valentine, D. (2002). Distance learning: Promises, problems, and possibilities. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3).

[Online: www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/valentine53.html]

Wegman, E. J., & Solka, J. L. (1999). Implications of distance learning methodologies for statistical education. 1999 Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Sections on Statistsical Education, Teaching Statistics in the Health Sciences, and Consulting (pp. 13-16). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.

Wernet, S. P., Olliges, R. H., & Delicath, T. A. (2000). Postcourse evaluations of WebCT (Web Course Tools) classes by social work students. Research on Social Work Practice, 10(4) 487-504.

 

 

SCOTT R. Evans

FXB 513

Department for Biostatistics

Harvard School of Public Health

651 Huntington Ave

Boston, MA 02115