EXPLORINg Beginning Inference with
Novice Grade 7 Students
JANE M. WATSON
University of Tasmania
This study documented efforts to facilitate ideas of beginning inference in novice grade 7 students. A design experiment allowed modified teaching opportunities in light of observation of components of a framework adapted from that developed by Pfannkuch for teaching informal inference with box plots. Box plots were replaced by hat plots, a feature available with the software TinkerPlotsTM. Data in TinkerPlots files were analyzed on four occasions and observed responses to tasks were categorized using a hierarchical model. The observed outcomes provided evidence of change in studentsí appreciation of beginning inference over the four sessions. Suggestions for change are made for the use of the framework in association with the intervention and the software to enhance understanding of beginning inference.
Keywords: Statistics education research; Hat plots; Informal inference; Middle school students; TinkerPlots
Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 59-83, http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/serj
” International Association for Statistical Education (IASE/ISI), November, 2008
Bakker, A. (2004). Design research in statistics education: On symbolizing and computer tools. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-Ŗ Press, Center for Science and Mathematics Education.
Bakker, A., Biehler, R., & Konold, C. (2005). Should young students learn about box plots? In G. Burrill & M. Camden (Eds.), Curricular Development in Statistics Education: International Association for Statistical Education 2004 Roundtable (pp. 163-173). Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
Ben-Zvi, D., Gil, E., & Apel, N. (2007, August). What is hidden beyond the data? Helping young students to reason and argue about some wider universe. Paper presented at the Fifth International Research Forum on Statistical Reasoning, Thinking, and Literacy (SRTL-5), University of Warwick, UK.
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
Cobb, P. (1999). Individual and collective mathematical development: The case of statistical data analysis. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1, 5-43.
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., deSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
Fitzallen, N. (2007). Evaluating data analysis software: The case of TinkerPlots. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 12(1), 23-28.
Friel, S. N., OíConnor, W., & Mamer, J. D. (2006). More than ďMeanmedianmodeĒ and a bar graph: Whatís needed to have a statistical conversation? In G. F. Burrill (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning with data and chance. Sixty-eighth yearbook (pp. 117-137). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Kirkpatrick, E. M. (1983). Chambers 20th Century Dictionary (New Ed.). Edinburgh: W & R Chambers Ltd.
Konold, C. (2007). Designing a Data Analysis Tool for Learners. In M. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data: The 33rd Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 267-291). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Konold, C., & Miller, C. D. (2005). TinkerPlots: Dynamic data exploration. [Computer software] Emeryville, CA: Key Curriculum Press.
Konold, C., Robinson, A., Khalil, K., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., Wing, R., & Mayr, S. (2002). Studentsí use of modal clumps to summarize data. In B. Phillips (Ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Teaching Statistics: Developing a statistically literate society, Cape Town, South Africa. [CD-ROM]. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Moore, D. S. (1991). Statistics: Concepts and controversies (3rd ed.). New York: Freeman.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
Pegg, J. E. (2002). Assessment in mathematics: A developmental approach. In J. M. Royer (Ed.), Mathematical cognition (pp. 227-259). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Pfannkuch, M. (2005). Probability and statistical inference: How can teachers enable learners to make the connection? In G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school: Challenges for teaching and learning (pp. 267-294). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Pfannkuch, M. (2006a). Informal inferential reasoning. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics: Working cooperatively in statistics education, Salvador, Brazil. [CD-ROM]. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
Pfannkuch, M. (2006b). Comparing box plot distributions: A teacherís reasoning. Statistics Education Research Journal, 5(2), 27-45.
Rubin, A., & Hammerman, J. K. (2006). Understanding data through new software representations. In G. F. Burrill (Ed.), Thinking and reasoning with data and chance. Sixty-eighth yearbook (pp. 241-256). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Rubin, A., Hammerman, J. K. L., & Konold, C. (2006). Exploring informal inference with interactive visualization software. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics: Working cooperatively in statistics education, Salvador, Brazil. [CD-ROM]. Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute.
The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (1999). The beginning of statistical inference: Comparing two data sets. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37, 145-168.
JANE M. WATSON
Faculty of Education, University of Tasmania
Private Bag 66
Hobart, Tasmania 7001