Subject:
Re: Re: [R] draft of posting guide. Sorry.
From:
Tim Churches <tchur@optushome.com.au>
Date:
Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:14:19 +1100
To:
"rossini @ u . washington . edu" <rossini@u.washington.edu>
CC:
"r-help @ stat . math . ethz . ch" <r-help@stat.math.ethz.ch>

A.J. Rossini <rossini@blindglobe.net> wrote:

> However, the amount (and quality) of
> (freely-available, at least for the cost of download, which might not
> be free) documentation for R is simply incredible.  The closest that
> I've seen, for freely available languages, is Python, for actual
> quality of documentation.


The Python documentation is truly excellent, but I agree, the R documentation is 
even better. Sometimes the R help is a bit terse, but that simply means that one 
has to think a bit to work out what is meant, but I have never found it to be 
insufficient.

Tim C

______________________________________________
R-help@stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help