Department of Statistics
2026 Seminars
Seminars by year: Current | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026
Speaker: Ben Stevenson
Affiliation: UoA
When: Thursday, 21 May 2026, 11:00 am to 12:00 pm
Where: 303-310
Abstract: Spatial capture-recapture (SCR) models are routinely used to estimate density and distribution of wildlife populations. Animal locations are assumed to arise from a point process describing the distribution of animals over space, but these locations remain unobserved. Because fitting a point process without observing the points is tricky, almost all SCR methods rely on an assumption of independence between locations by using Poisson or binomial processes. This assumption is often violated in practice because animals cluster together, for example due to unobserved variation in habitat quality or for social reasons. Here, I describe a new method where the point process intensity function within SCR is modelled using penalised regression splines. Advantages include the ability to fit semiparametric smoothers for effects of available covariates on animal density, and fit log-Gaussian Cox processes to accommodate clustering that cannot be explained by these covariates. We treat basis function coefficients as random effects, using the Laplace approximation to compute a marginal likelihood. Additional integration is required to deal with the unobserved animal locations. I provide an illustrative application of our method to data collected on an acoustic survey of the endangered northern yellow-cheeked crested gibbon in Cambodia, demonstrating that our method can flexibly model wildlife density and distribution to provide insights that are not available using standard alternatives.
Coauthors: Andrew Seaton, David Borchers, Milou Groenenberg
(i) Diffusive Nested Sampling: Not Dead Yet; (ii) 24 Hours of Stats: Lessons from a Mode B Online AssessmentSpeaker: Brendon Brewer & Anne Patel
Affiliation: UoA
When: Thursday, 14 May 2026, 11:00 am to 12:00 pm
Where: 303-310
(i) Title: Diffusive Nested Sampling: Not Dead Yet
Abstract
Diffusive Nested Sampling is a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm I developed over 15 years ago (!) and have been using routinely ever since. It works well on many problems including ones that challenge other algorithms (e.g., multimodal or strongly correlated posterior distributions, phase transitions). It also calculates the marginal likelihood/evidence value needed for model comparison. The canonical implementation is DNest4 from 2018, which I will demonstrate in this talk. However, it is written in C++, and previously assumed that the user was capable of implementing models by writing a C++ class. This is still the best way for performance applications. However, I have recently added some features making it easier to specify models in other languages (R, Python, and Julia) by writing only two functions. This should reduce the programming burden significantly for anyone interested in trying it out.
(ii) Title: 24 Hours of Stats: Lessons from a Mode B Online Assessment
Abstract:
How do you run a 24-hour invigilated exam in a large Stage 1 course? In this session, I'll share our experience implementing Mode B Invigilated, online Inspera assessments in STATS 100.
I will cover the Inspera/Canvas setup, student comms, managing student expectations and strategies for delivery on the day/night/next morning. We'll discuss what worked well, and how this model fits into the new Lane 1/Lane 2 assessment in our course, and at a program level. this can be a great option if you want (or need) more Lane 1 assessment in your course, or at the program level.
(i) Estimation of gillnet selectivity and population length & (ii) Gauss Is Not Mocked: less powerful multiparameter testsSpeaker: Russell Millar and Thomas Lumley
Affiliation: UoA
When: Thursday, 30 April 2026, 11:00 am to 12:00 pm
Where: 303-310
(i) Estimation of gillnet selectivity and population length frequencies
Abstract: The size selectivity of gillnets can be estimated using the catch data from experimental fishing of gangs of net panels having different mesh sizes. Gillnet selectivity curves can take a wide variety of shapes, and currently their estimation requires consideration of several different parametric forms, with right-skewed or bimodal curves typically being preferred. Here it is shown that the generalized additive model (GAM) framework provides a convenient and more flexible alternative. The GAM approach also generalizes the scope of analysis by permitting the population length frequencies of encounter to be jointly estimated as a smooth function of length. Moreover, the GAM framework allows for the inclusion of covariates such as sex or a condition index, and accommodates hierarchical sampling designs and spatial or temporal effects. Relative fishing power of the different sized meshes can also be included, notwithstanding that care with non-identifiability is required.The ease of use of the GAM approach is demonstrated on previously published lake trout data.
(ii) Gauss Is Not Mocked: less powerful multiparameter tests
Abstract: Usually it doesn't make sense to describe one test as more powerful than another -- different tests are just powerful against different alternatives. In survey statistics there are two approaches to creating multiparameter tests: weighting using the precision matrix of the parameter estimates and weighting using what would be the precision matrix of the parameter estimates with complete data. The latter are the Rao-Scott tests; the former I will call intrinsically-weighted tests. Keiran Shao's MSc thesis surprisingly found the Rao-Scott tests to be less powerful in all the examples he simulated. I will talk about whether "the Rao-Scott tests are less powerful" is (a) meaningful and (b) true. The Gauss-Markov theorem is not the answer, but it is in the vicinity of the answer.
WMFM! (What’s my fitted model)Speaker: James Curran
Affiliation: UoA
When: Thursday, 16 April 2026, 11:00 am to 12:00 pm
Where: 303-310
Abstract: It this talk I will demonstrate an application that I have been working on over the last two months to help STATS 20x students understand a particular concept. The aims of this project were fairly low, but the technologies and insights I have discovered along the way – especially with respect to large language models have been extremely revealing and much larger than I could have ever anticipated. These discoveries, I hope, will let us take a hard look at what we are teaching and what we think is important. I hope to show you some really cool stuff too.
I am aiming to have a combination of talking, demonstration and some serious discussion.
(i) Adaptive designs and (ii) applications of TabPFN in statistics and AISpeaker: Dennis Christensen
Affiliation: Norwegian Defence Research Establishment
When: Monday, 16 March 2026, 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm
Where: 303-310
This presentation has two parts. In the first, I will discuss some of the challenges of working with adaptive designs. These are experimental designs in which the next input may depend on the data collected up to that point, breaking independence between observations. As a result, the large-sample theory of adaptive designs is significantly more difficult than in the i.i.d. case, and asymptotic normality must often be verified on a case-by-case basis. I will present open problems concerning the asymptotic properties of designs currently used in the energetics industry and research, developed to test the sensitivity of explosives.
The second part of the talk focuses on applications of TabPFN. Introduced in January last year, with a major update in October, TabPFN is a foundation model for tabular data that outperforms state-of-the-art methods such as XGBoost on many regression and classification tasks. Unlike traditional machine learning approaches, it requires no fine-tuning or additional training: TabPFN is pre-trained on an enormous corpus of synthetic datasets designed to capture nonlinear relationships in tabular problems. In addition to outlining ideas for future use, I will present one application in which we use TabPFN to improve estimates of conditional Shapley values in explainable AI.
About the speaker: Dennis Christensen is a researcher at the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment (FFI), visiting the University of Auckland from early January until mid-April. His research focuses on statistical aspects of sensitivity testing of energetic materials., with particular focus on explosive remnants of war and dumped ammunition. He completed his PhD at the University of Oslo in 2024.
A flexible model for dynamic networks of stochastic sizeSpeaker: Duncan Clark
Affiliation: Williams College
When: Thursday, 22 January 2026, 12:00 pm to 1:00 pm
Where: 303-310
Abstract: We propose a novel modeling framework for time-evolving networks allowing for long-term dependence in network features that update in continuous time. Dynamic network growth is functionally parameterized via the conditional intensity of a marked point process. This characterization enables flexible modeling of both the time of updates and the network updates themselves, dependent on the entire left-continuous sample path. We propose a path-dependent nonlinear marked Hawkes process as an expressive platform for modeling such data; its dynamic mark space embeds the time-evolving network. We establish stability conditions, demonstrate simulation and subsequent feasible likelihood-based inference through numerical study, and illustrate the methodology with an application to conference attendee social network data. The resulting methodology serves as a general framework that can be readily adapted to a wide range of network topologies and point process model specifications.